Journal
:“Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication”. Impact factor:
2.067.
Paper
“Dialectic
Tensions of Information Quality: Social
Networking
Sites and Hiring?”, written
by Jacqueline
C. Pike, Patrick J. Bateman and Brian Butler.
Paper
examines the quality of information that is obtained via social
networking sites during the hiring process which is a very
challenging process because of the lack of quality in information
prevents the discovery of truth about the candidates. Qualitative
method of semi structured interviewing with hiring personnel were
made for the research. According to the information quality
literature, information quality is a multidimensional construct. As
there is not an unanimous agreement on exact dimensions, there is a
consensus that it has four dimension which are Accessibility IQ,
Contextual IQ, Intrinsic IQ and Representational IQ. Qualitative
interview data were collected and grouped by researchers which
emerged the poles according to the tensions between these dimensions.
Finally paper concludes that quality issue is a very complex subject
because of these tensions and understanding these tensions is
important and necessary to explain the nature of perceptions of
social networking sites' information quality during recruitment
process.
Semi structured interviewing method was used in the paper. It is a practical and efficient way of gathering detailed data which can not be easily gathered by observing. In my opinion the main advantage of this method is it provides detailed information as in those interviews participants are able to talk in depth with the little direction from the interviewer. Those little directions enable interviewer to collect the required data in detail. Moreover it gives chance to interviewer to ask spontaneous questions besides predefined questions. Whereas semi structured interviewing is expensive and time consuming. Moreover as few predefined questions are used, respondents may be asked different questions. Parallel to this it can be said that it is not totally but somehow dependent to the interviewer. Moreover answers do not enable researchers to make generalizations.
What
I learned about qualitative methods by reading this paper is that it
allows researchers to collect detailed data to be examined. In my
opinion with an experienced interviewer's directions semi structured
interviewing might provide very useful, in depth information which
would be very beneficial for the research.
The
conclusion that the paper put out is I think very open ended. I think
not deriving more precise conclusion would be the main methodological
problem about this paper. I think they could have directed the
participants to give more detailed answers to enable them to drew
more certain conclusion at the end.
Case
study is study of a specific situation, person, event, social group
or a specific “case”. It is a research strategy that focuses on
understanding the dynamics present. Case study can either focus on
single or multiple cases. Basically case studies combine data
collection method such as archives, interviews, observations. They
can be used to accomplish numerous aims such as providing
description, testing or generating theory. (Eisenhardt,
1989)
Paper
“The
Presence of Hyperlinks on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of
Cyworld in Korea”,
written by Steven Sams and Ham Woo Park.
The
research was conducted to determine the extent to which
hyperlinks appear within user-submitted comments on Korean social
network service Cyworld.(Hams, Park 2013). A software tool were
developed to investigate comments that were made to the 130 Korean
National Assembly Members' social network profile. As a result
researchers found out that hyperlinks are solely targeted to Korean
services, males are more likely to comment on political profile
pages, profile pages of ruling politicians were found to be more
prominent than opposition parties' politicians and Message
Amplification and Network Building were found to be the two main
reasons for submitting links. In my opinion paper defines the
research questions and the aim of the study clearly which is to
examine the comments on politicians network profile to point out to
which purpose people comment hyperlinks, who post comments mostly
women or man, which politician group get the most of comments etc. I
think according to Eisenhardt's table this can be considered as a
strength of the paper as a good getting started step. However at
crafting instruments and protocols step I think this paper uses more
quantitative data collection, in my opinion qualitative data
collection is less that can be seen as weakness o the paper. Moreover
the lack of qualitative data can be seen at step shaping hypothesis
as answer for the question “why” here is not satisfactory enough
in my opinion.
References
Eisenhardt,
K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 14(4), pp. 532-550.
Pike,
C. J, Bateman, P. J, Butler, B. (2013).
Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication,
Vol 19, pp 56-77
Sams.
S, Park, H. P. (2013) Journal
of Computer-Mediated Communication,
Vol 19, pp 712-749
No comments:
Post a Comment